AKTA PERHUBUNGAN PERUSAHAAN 1967 EBOOK

KAJIAN LITERATUR PEKERJA Akta perhubungan perusahaan di bawah seksyen 2 memberi takrifan pekerja iaitu, mana-mana orang termasuk. View Test Prep – Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan Akta from ECON at Act INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT Incorporating all amendments up. Akta perhubungan perusahaan (akta ) hingga 1hb Mac di susun oleh Lembaga Penyelidikan Undang-Undang. By: Malaysia. Material type.

Author: Golrajas Tejin
Country: Lesotho
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 5 November 2007
Pages: 22
PDF File Size: 17.63 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.99 Mb
ISBN: 416-9-62017-389-2
Downloads: 66235
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kera

Misconduct – Illegal removal of goods from airline flight – Whether misconduct proved on a balance of probabilities – Whether wkta with just cause or akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 – Industrial Relations Acts.

Breach of company rules and policies – Unauthorised receipt of gratification a,ta Claimant accused of receiving secret akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 from car dealers – Whether proven – Evaluation perhubungn evidence – Quality of evidence – Effect of – Claimant denying charges – Whether company had acted reasonably in thinking claimant had been guilty of charge – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss.

Contract of employment – Terms and conditions – Contract silent on retirement age – Whether claimant entitled to be employed as long as fit and able to perform duties – Industrial Relations Acts.

Library DOE catalog › Details for: Akta perhubungan perusahaan ( akta )

Sekiranya runding akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 tersebut gagal, tuntutan akan dirujuk kepada Menteri yang kemudiannya merujuk kes tersebut ke Mahkamah Perusahaan. Misconduct – Claimant walked out from company’s premises – Whether claimant abandoned employment – Pergubungan claimant had no akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 but to leave in view of company’s abusive conduct – Whether company dismissed claimant – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Acts.

Pelitek Sdn Bhd Eddie Yeo Soon Chye [] 1 ILR Redundancy – Restructuring exercise – Claimant’s services terminated following rejection of VSS offer – Whether company acted bona fide in terminating claimant – Whether claimant’s services still existed at time of retrenchment – Whether company proved it was operating under challenging set of circumstances necessitating retrenchment – Industrial Relations Acts.

Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance application – Whether complainant had been a preferential creditor pursuant to s. Documentary evidence – Hearsay evidence – Functions of Industrial Court – Whether letters written by car dealers akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 been hearsay – Whether letters could be accepted as evidence by court – Both car dealers not called to testify in court – Effect of – When hearsay evidence could be accepted by court – Whether claimant had been aware of letters – Akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 claimant had been given a reasonable opportunity of commenting oerhubungan it – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss.

Poor performance – Failure akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 achieve sales target – Absence of warning letters or show cause letters – Sufficient time and opportunity to improve not accorded – Whether dismissal with just cause amta excuse – Industrial Relations Acts. Representations on dismissals 1 Where a workman, irrespective of whether he is a member of a trade union of workmen or otherwise, considers that he has been dismissed without just cause or excuse by his employer, he may make representations in writing to the Director Akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 to be reinstated in his former employment; the representations may be filed at the office of the Director General nearest to the place of employment from which the workman was dismissed.

Related Posts  RABINDRA RACHANABALI IN VERSION PDF

Berdasarkan peruntukan di atas, perusshaan ringkasnya proses representasi di bawah seksyen 20 Akta adalah seperti berikut: Berdasarkan peruntukan di atas, secara ringkasnya proses representasi di bawah seksyen 20 Akta adalah seperti berikut:.

Seksyen 20 Akta memperuntukkan hak kepada akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 pekerja memfailkan representasi untuk dipulihkan semula ke jawatan asalnya [1].

Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967 (Disemak – 1976)

Kontrak pekerjaan – Kontrak ditukarkan kepada kontrak tetap tempoh tiga akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 – Sama ada kontrak tersebut tulen – Sama perushaaan penuntut menerima tawaran kontrak tempoh tetap tersebut – Sama ada penuntut diberhentikan kerja selepas tamat tempoh – Sama ada penamatan kerja atas sebab atau alasan adil – Akta Perhubungan Perusahaans. Berdasarkan proses yang dinyatakan tersebut, adalah jelas bahawa setiap kes pemecatan tidak difailkan secara terus ke Mahkamah Perusahaan.

Admissions – Charge akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 Whether claimant had pleaded guilty to charge – Evidence ata by akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 – Evaluation of – Factors to consider – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss. Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance application – Date the first respondent had gone into 1976 – Date when joinder applications had been filed – Whether leave of High Court pursuant to s.

Sime Securities Sdn Bhd In Liquidation Susila Sithamparam [] 1 ILR Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance application – Whether complainant should have joined second, third and aktx respondents in her dismissal proceedings – Factors to consider – Whether joinder suitable to be granted in the circumstances Asnah Ahmad v.

More Details for: Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan (Pindaan) 19

Remedy – Backwages – Calculation – Overtime – Whether overtime could be calculated as part akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 claimant’s salary when awarding backwages Visulingam Somu v. Aria Sdn Bhd Eddie Yeo Soon Chye [] 1 ILR Performance – Unsatisfactory performance – Whether claimant had failed to complete tasks akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 time – Whether proven by company – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Effect of – Conduct of claimant – Claimant’s years of service with company – Effect of – Whether company’s actions had been reasonable under the akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 – What the company should have done – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss.

Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance application – Whether complainant should have joined second, third and fourth respondents in her dismissal proceedings – Factors to consider – Whether joinder suitable to be granted in the circumstances Asnah Ahmad v.

Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance application – First, second and fourth respondents dormant – Whether corporate veil of second, third and fourth respondents should be lifted – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Effect of – Whether there had been functional integration or unity of establishment between parties Akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 Ahmad v.

Provided that where a workman is dismissed with notice he may file a representation at any time during the period of such notice but not later than sixty days from the expiry thereof. Malaysia Airlines System Bhd Jalaldin Hussain [] 1 ILR Misconduct – Claimant walked out from company’s premises – Whether claimant abandoned employment – Whether claimant had no option but to leave in view of company’s abusive conduct – Whether company dismissed claimant – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Acts.

Related Posts  DEVELOPING SECOND LANGUAGE SKILLS KENNETH CHASTAIN DOWNLOAD

Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan [ Akta ] digubal untuk melindungi para pekerja daripada pemberhentian perkhidmatan yang dilakukan oleh majikan tanpa sebab dan alasan yang munasabah. UMW Toyota Motor Sdn Bhd Rajendran Nayagam [] 1 ILR Documentary evidence – Hearsay evidence – Functions of Industrial Court – Whether letters written by car dealers had been hearsay – Whether letters could be accepted as evidence by court – Both car dealers not called to testify in court – Effect of – When hearsay evidence could be accepted by court – Whether claimant had been aware akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 letters – Whether claimant had been given a reasonable opportunity of commenting on it – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss.

Mail will not be published.

Performance – Unsatisfactory performance – Whether claimant had failed to complete tasks on time – Whether proven by akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Effect of – Conduct of claimant – Claimant’s aktz of akt with company – Effect of – Whether company’s actions had been reasonable under the circumstances – What the company should have done – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Actss.

Documentary evidence – Findings of DI – Whether it had been perverse akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 Factors to consider – Effect of – Whether a prima facie case had been made out against claimant – Effect of – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Acts.

Sime Securities Sdn Bhd In Perusahan Susila Sithamparam [] 1 ILR Procedure – Parties – Joinder – Joinder of parties in a non-compliance application – First, second and fourth respondents dormant – Whether corporate veil of second, third and fourth respondents should be lifted – Evidence adduced – Perysahaan of – Effect of – Whether there akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 been functional integration or unity of establishment between parties Asnah Ahmad v.

Breach of terms and conditions of contract – Addendum to terms and akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 of employment contract – Introduction of 55 retirement age policy – Whether a unilateral variation of employment contract – Whether company justified in akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 retirement age policy – Whether notice on retirement age policy effectively communicated to claimant – Industrial Relations Actpwrusahaan.

Redundancy – Restructuring exercise – Claimant’s services terminated following rejection of VSS offer – Whether company acted bona fide in terminating claimant – Whether claimant’s services perusahaaan existed at time of retrenchment – Whether company proved it was operating under challenging set of circumstances necessitating retrenchment – Industrial Relations Acts.

Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply. Constructive dismissal – Company terminating claimant’s services three months after introducing 55 retirement age policy – No retirement clause in employment letter – Whether claimant entitled to continue in employment as long as fit and able to perform duties – Whether company justified in unilaterally varying employment contract – Whether notice on retirement age policy effectively communicated akta perhubungan perusahaan 1967 claimant – Industrial Relations Acts.